Industry and authorities divided on cryptocurrency risk

Divided opinion on the perceived risk of cryptocurrency - including the links between cryptocurrency and illicit activity - were among the key findings of a new global survey.

The Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI) and the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (ACAMS) commissioned YouGov to survey 566 professionals across the financial and cryptocurrency industries, including cryptocurrency exchanges, financial regulators and financial intelligence units.

It found that criminal activity remains top of mind for both governments and crypto industry professionals, with 70 per cent of total respondents highlighting this as a concern.

When asked to select any areas of concern, respondents overall indicated they are worried about the use of cryptocurrency for money laundering (84 per cent), on the dark web (84 per cent), for procurement of illicit goods (83 per cent) by sanctioned actors (82 per cent), by terrorist organisations (79 per cent), to fund human trafficking (76 per cent) and in fraudulent initial coin offerings (75 per cent).

However, the survey demonstrates a disconnect between governments and the industry on the nature of risks posed by cryptocurrency and ongoing concerns over the use of cryptocurrency for criminal activity. The cryptocurrency industry was notably less worried about each of the listed risks, considering only sanctions evasion as a high priority.

It also found respondents split over whether they consider cryptocurrency a risk or an opportunity – with significant gaps between government and financial industry perceptions and those directly involved in the crypto industry.

The cryptocurrency industry largely believes that cryptocurrency transactions offer more transparency than traditional financial transactions, and that transactions are compatible with sanctions screening and compliance, while financial institutions and government disagreed.

While cryptocurrency professionals are aware of the risks in their industry, other actors such as the media, politicians and the general public are less aware of the risks. Overall, there is a far higher likelihood (78 per cent) that institutions will seek guidance from non-governmental organisations such as trade bodies and blockchain associations, than from governments. Respondents were also of the view that governments are more likely to defer to international bodies (45 per cent) over their own regulatory systems (35 per cent).

Kayla Izenman, research analyst at RUSI’s Centre for Financial Crime and Security Studies and co-author of the survey, said: “The crypto industry appears to have a great amount of confidence in their own abilities to counter and detect risk, whereas government doesn’t have nearly as much faith.

“Bridging this gap is essential, as all sectors agree that the use of cryptocurrency is on the rise, but we know there’s no clear consensus on domestic regulatory action – this risks opening the door to illicit activities.”

Rick McDonell, executive director at ACAMS, former executive secretary of the Financial Action Task Force and co-author of the survey, added: “The results of this survey give a unique global insight into how respondents from governments, financial institutions and the crypto industry itself think about cryptocurrency - its potential and its risks.

“Their views are well worth noting as policy making and regulatory enforcement continue to take shape around the world.”

    Share Story:

Recent Stories


Banking's GenAI evolution: Beyond the hype, building the future
In the first episode of a three-part video podcast series sponsored by HCLTech, Sudip Lahiri, Executive Vice President & Head of Financial Services for Europe & UKI at HCLTech explores how financial institutions can navigate the transformative potential of Generative AI while building lasting foundations for innovation.

Beyond compliance: Transforming document management into a strategic advantage for financial institutions
In this exclusive fireside chat, John Rockliffe, Pre-Sales Manager at d.velop, discusses the findings of Adapting to a Digital-Native World: Financial Services Document Management Beyond 2025 and explores how FSIs can turn document workflows into a competitive advantage.

Sanctions evasion in an era of conflict: Optimising KYC and monitoring to tackle crime
The ongoing war in Ukraine and resulting sanctions on Russia, and the continuing geopolitical tensions have resulted in an unprecedented increase in parties added to sanctions lists.

Achieving operational resilience in the financial sector: Navigating DORA with confidence
Operational resilience has become crucial for financial institutions navigating today's digital landscape riddled with cyber risks and challenges. The EU's Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) provides a harmonised framework to address these complexities, but there are key factors that financial institutions must ensure they consider.