Financial market weaknesses ‘responsible’ for pandemic dysfunction, says BoE

Financial market vulnerabilities led to tightening of financial conditions and dysfunction in March 2020, according to Jonathan Hall, member of the Bank of England’s (BoE) financial policy committee.

Hall said that weaknesses had been exposed during the period and were responsible for disruption even in the most liquid markets, like US treasuries and UK gilts.

“Actions by market participants that may have been rational when considered in isolation, led to systemic issues when considered in aggregate,” the committee member said in a speech at the business school at Cardiff University, Prifysgol Caerdydd. “Although it was health concerns that understandably dominated front page news at the time, we should not underestimate the severity of the financial stress.”

Hall claimed that without “extraordinary” and fast actions by central banks, including the BoE, these vulnerabilities would have worsened outcomes for households and businesses.

According to him, although financial markets have recovered over the past year, there have been several isolated incidents that suggest that these weaknesses still exist.

He said that if these flaws were to remain without policy action to increase resilience, the bank would expect to see similar dynamics in the future.

Hall outlined six key proposals to help build resiliency in the market:

1. Increase transparency and reduce pro-cyclicality in margin calculations. Ensure all derivatives users enhance planning for, and management of, liquidity outflows.
2. Reform money market funds so that they are either regulated and managed in a way that allows them to perform their function in times of stress, or are no longer considered cash-like investments
3. Ensure that open-ended investment funds align their redemption terms with the liquidity of their assets. They can do this by holding more liquid assets, by lengthening redemption periods, or through more effective use of swing pricing.
4. Make it a principle to always analyse market structure changes in the context of their impacts on liquidity in bad times as well as good.
5. Consider actions to reduce both jump-to-illiquidity risk, and the risk that excessive leverage by non-bank financial institutions causes market dysfunction in stress.
6. Examine central bank tools, including exploring offering central bank government bond repo, with very high haircuts, to a broad array of counterparties that meet appropriate standards.

    Share Story:

Recent Stories


Data trust in the AI era: Building customer confidence through responsible banking
In the second episode of FStech’s three-part video podcast series sponsored by HCLTech, Sudip Lahiri, Executive Vice President & Head of Financial Services for Europe & UKI at HCLTech examines the critical relationship between data trust, transparency, and responsible AI implementation in financial services.

Banking's GenAI evolution: Beyond the hype, building the future
In the first episode of a three-part video podcast series sponsored by HCLTech, Sudip Lahiri, Executive Vice President & Head of Financial Services for Europe & UKI at HCLTech explores how financial institutions can navigate the transformative potential of Generative AI while building lasting foundations for innovation.

Beyond compliance: Transforming document management into a strategic advantage for financial institutions
In this exclusive fireside chat, John Rockliffe, Pre-Sales Manager at d.velop, discusses the findings of Adapting to a Digital-Native World: Financial Services Document Management Beyond 2025 and explores how FSIs can turn document workflows into a competitive advantage.

Sanctions evasion in an era of conflict: Optimising KYC and monitoring to tackle crime
The ongoing war in Ukraine and resulting sanctions on Russia, and the continuing geopolitical tensions have resulted in an unprecedented increase in parties added to sanctions lists.