A senior supervisor at the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) warned staff in May that they would face "the most unpleasant" consequences if they were overly aggressive during inspections of financial firms, according to an internal email reported by Reuters.

The news wire reported that the email was sent on 13 May by chief examiner Fatima Batie as the CFPB prepared to restart examinations after a lengthy suspension imposed following President Donald Trump's return to office. Batie reminded staff to comply with the agency's recently introduced "humility pledge" and wrote: "I promise you if you say something inflammatory or newsworthy it will get back to you in the most unpleasant manner and I'm not referring to my or Calvin's reaction," referring to Calvin Hagins, head of the examinations office.

The CFPB, the White House and Batie did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Hagins referred questions to agency representatives, while the email did not explain whose reaction Batie was referring to or what consequences staff might face.

Reuters reported that the warning came as the CFPB resumed supervisory work after acting director Russell Vought suspended examinations in early 2025 while seeking to reduce the agency's workforce, an effort that has been challenged in court. Vought told lawmakers last month that the bureau had recalibrated supervision to do "as little damage as possible" while adding: "That doesn't mean we're taking an approach to do...as little as possible. We're sticking to the law."

Austin Hinkle, a former senior counsel in the CFPB's Division of Supervision who is now in private practice, told Reuters that the message amounted to "pure intimidation" and could discourage examiners from conducting the robust questioning needed to uncover harmful misconduct. He said: "This message will be read by many at the CFPB as a clear threat that if they ask a question the institution doesn't like, their jobs may be on the line."

Reuters said the CFPB has reduced examinations by about 50 per cent under the Trump administration while shifting supervisory priorities away from areas including student loans and medical debt. The changes mirror a broader shift across US financial regulators, with agencies narrowing the scope of examinations and introducing new processes allowing regulated firms to complain about examiners' conduct.

---